Will Bryan Kohberger Meet Judge’s Deadline?

Published by Tony Brueski on

In the unfolding case of Brian Kohberger, the limelight isn’t solely on the defendant but equally on the strategy his defense attorneys are choosing to employ. The recent episode of the “Hidden Killers” podcast featured an insightful discussion between host Tony Brueski and guest Shavaun Scott, a noted psychotherapist and author, about the nuances of Kohberger’s defense and the court’s reaction to it.
 
A significant development, Brueski notes, is the judge’s decision to grant Kohberger’s attorneys an additional three weeks to furnish evidence supporting Kohberger’s alibi. “The alibi, as it stands, is peculiarly vague,” Brueski pointed out. “The defense maintains he has a penchant for nighttime drives. But without corroborative details, such as specific locations or potential witnesses, it raises more questions than it answers.”
 
Scott echoed these sentiments, questioning the viability of the alibi itself. “If they had concrete proof, such as a footage of his car far from the crime scene, that would be another matter,” she remarked. However, she also speculated about a potential pitfall: “What if the ‘nighttime drive’ is merely an explanation for why his car was seen near the residence in Moscow?”
 
For Brueski, this ‘nighttime drive’ defense appeared weak from the outset. “Claiming a penchant for nighttime drives without substantial proof or specificity seems more incriminating than exculpatory. It’s now imperative for the defense to determine if relevant footage even exists, given that most surveillance systems have short data retention policies.”
 
As the discussion veered toward the courtroom dynamics, Scott and Brueski both showed appreciation for the judge’s approach. Brueski remarked, “It almost feels as if the judge is piercing through apparent stall tactics. There seems to be a low tolerance for repetitious arguments that don’t bring any substantial value to Kohberger’s defense.”
 
Scott added her perspective, observing that while some judges can appear indecisive, often influenced by aggressive legal maneuvers, this particular judge seems both clear and fair in his decisions. “There’s a sense of clarity and an unmistakable intent to ensure justice without unnecessary delays,” she stated.
 
 However, the accelerated pace of the proceedings did raise some concerns. Brueski reflected, “It’s commendable how swiftly this case is moving, especially considering the trial is set to commence less than a year after the alleged crimes. Yet, such speed could potentially open doors to appellate issues later on.”
 
 In the intricate dance of legal proceedings, the Kohberger case serves as a testament to the challenges of building a defense, especially when it hinges on a seemingly flimsy alibi. With a deadline looming, the next few weeks will be crucial for Kohberger’s attorneys to either solidify their stance or reconsider their strategy.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com