Why Does Kohberger Have Such A Weak Alibi?
In a riveting new episode of the podcast “Hidden Killers,” host Tony Brueski delved deep into the intricacies of Bryan Kohberger’s alibi, the suspect linked to a series of murders. With guest Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor and attorney, the duo shed light on the defense strategy’s complexities.
Kohberger’s alibi, as discussed, centers around his nocturnal drives in the vicinity of the crime scenes. Brueski, with evident skepticism, remarked, “He just likes to drive around at night in the area. Well, surprised that’s what the alibi ended up being.” This peculiar justification, Brueski suggests, might be a “placeholder” – a temporary defense until more concrete facts can support it. Faddis expanded on this notion, likening it to tactics in civil practice where defense attorneys assert a position while keeping avenues open to introducing new defenses as more information becomes available.
Faddis noted, “They don’t identify any witnesses who can support his version.” The fact that a vehicle resembling Kohberger’s was reportedly seen near the quadruple murder site only adds to the convolution. He surmised, “It’s almost like a placeholder a little bit.”
A key legal point was addressed: if this alibi does evolve or change, will the defense be required to disclose the additional details before the trial? “Different jurisdictions have different rules on this,” Faddis explained. However, if an alibi is presented, witnesses and basic facts underlying that alibi usually must be disclosed. The principle behind this is to prevent a “trial by ambush,” ensuring both defense and prosecution are well-prepared.
Yet, the lingering question remains: Why was there a delay in the announcement of this alibi? Brueski postulated that it might be a legal tactic: file a potential alibi by the deadline and then refine it based on unfolding information. This is supported by Faddis’ theory, suggesting that the defense might be “slow playing while they’re sort of scrambling to try and find something to support it.”
The discourse then shifted to a fascinating angle – Kohberger’s academic background in criminology. Given his expertise, would this knowledge be beneficial to his defense or prove detrimental? The host mused, “Why would he do something like this when he already knows how these things work?”
Analyzing this angle, Faddis posited that Kohberger’s background could be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, his criminology knowledge would undoubtedly aid in structuring a robust defense. Conversely, the prosecution might argue that Kohberger’s in-depth understanding allowed him to cover his tracks carefully.
“You know, the reason we can’t find the murder weapon, for example, is because the defendant who did this is schooled in criminology,” Faddis stated, elucidating how the prosecution might approach Kohberger’s expertise.
In conclusion, the episode underscored the multifaceted legal strategies at play and the profound impact of Kohberger’s background on his defense. As the trial looms, only time will tell if this nighttime drive alibi stands firm or is a legal placeholder.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Kohberger’s alibi, as discussed, centers around his nocturnal drives in the vicinity of the crime scenes. Brueski, with evident skepticism, remarked, “He just likes to drive around at night in the area. Well, surprised that’s what the alibi ended up being.” This peculiar justification, Brueski suggests, might be a “placeholder” – a temporary defense until more concrete facts can support it. Faddis expanded on this notion, likening it to tactics in civil practice where defense attorneys assert a position while keeping avenues open to introducing new defenses as more information becomes available.
Faddis noted, “They don’t identify any witnesses who can support his version.” The fact that a vehicle resembling Kohberger’s was reportedly seen near the quadruple murder site only adds to the convolution. He surmised, “It’s almost like a placeholder a little bit.”
A key legal point was addressed: if this alibi does evolve or change, will the defense be required to disclose the additional details before the trial? “Different jurisdictions have different rules on this,” Faddis explained. However, if an alibi is presented, witnesses and basic facts underlying that alibi usually must be disclosed. The principle behind this is to prevent a “trial by ambush,” ensuring both defense and prosecution are well-prepared.
Yet, the lingering question remains: Why was there a delay in the announcement of this alibi? Brueski postulated that it might be a legal tactic: file a potential alibi by the deadline and then refine it based on unfolding information. This is supported by Faddis’ theory, suggesting that the defense might be “slow playing while they’re sort of scrambling to try and find something to support it.”
The discourse then shifted to a fascinating angle – Kohberger’s academic background in criminology. Given his expertise, would this knowledge be beneficial to his defense or prove detrimental? The host mused, “Why would he do something like this when he already knows how these things work?”
Analyzing this angle, Faddis posited that Kohberger’s background could be a double-edged sword. On the one hand, his criminology knowledge would undoubtedly aid in structuring a robust defense. Conversely, the prosecution might argue that Kohberger’s in-depth understanding allowed him to cover his tracks carefully.
“You know, the reason we can’t find the murder weapon, for example, is because the defendant who did this is schooled in criminology,” Faddis stated, elucidating how the prosecution might approach Kohberger’s expertise.
In conclusion, the episode underscored the multifaceted legal strategies at play and the profound impact of Kohberger’s background on his defense. As the trial looms, only time will tell if this nighttime drive alibi stands firm or is a legal placeholder.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
