‘The Defense Has Nothing’: Ret FBI Coffindaffer On Bryan Kohberger
In a recent episode of the podcast “Hidden Killers,” hosts Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer dissected the developing case against defendant Kohberger, delving into the numerous allegations made by defense attorney Ann Taylor. Drawing on her extensive law enforcement experience, Coffindaffer offered unique insights into the defense’s likely strategies and the broader implications for the impending trial.
Brueski began the discussion by noting the onslaught of allegations recently made by Taylor, including suggestions that crucial DNA evidence might have been planted and doubts over the standard of proof required for an indictment. The hosts mused over the potential for more such tactics aimed at swaying potential jurors, with Coffindaffer predicting a motion for continuance would soon be submitted to alleviate media pressure around the proposed October trial date.
Coffindaffer forecasted, “I also look for the searches, specifically the searches at 1122 King Road, to also be questioned.” She suggested that the defense would scrutinize the training records of law enforcement officers involved in the case and call into question their workmanship or veracity. This could be based on a perceived lack of training or potential giglio issues, instances of an officer’s truthfulness being called into question, that might yet be uncovered.
In discussing potential ramifications, Coffindaffer speculated that these issues might form the basis of suppression hearings, where the defense would aim to dismiss specific pieces of evidence. As she explained, “They’re going to try to bring up actions perhaps of that individual in the past that they were involved in something that involved not being truthful about finding something.”
Drawing comparisons to the notorious O.J. Simpson case, the hosts noted how this strategy had been used effectively against Detective Mark Furman, whose credibility was undermined by past actions. Coffindaffer elaborated on the possibility of the defense extrapolating past conduct to argue that either the evidence found or the interviews conducted were tainted.
Brueski raised concerns about this strategy’s difficulty and potential ramifications, asking, “Is that an attainable goal to reach? Or could this end up just making them look utterly ridiculous in trying to go down that road?”
In response, Coffindaffer remained pragmatic: “The defense will throw out everything they possibly can,” she said, pointing out that this is common practice when faced with a strong case. She highlighted the assertion that touch DNA had been misinterpreted as a dirty tactic and explained the biological basis behind this evidence. She asserted that such allegations would continue to surface to discredit the investigation.
This comprehensive analysis offered by Brueski and Coffindaffer provides a peek behind the curtain at the strategic maneuvering that often characterizes high-profile trials. As the Kohberger case progresses, the insights shared by these veteran crime watchers will continue to provide valuable context and understanding.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Brueski began the discussion by noting the onslaught of allegations recently made by Taylor, including suggestions that crucial DNA evidence might have been planted and doubts over the standard of proof required for an indictment. The hosts mused over the potential for more such tactics aimed at swaying potential jurors, with Coffindaffer predicting a motion for continuance would soon be submitted to alleviate media pressure around the proposed October trial date.
Coffindaffer forecasted, “I also look for the searches, specifically the searches at 1122 King Road, to also be questioned.” She suggested that the defense would scrutinize the training records of law enforcement officers involved in the case and call into question their workmanship or veracity. This could be based on a perceived lack of training or potential giglio issues, instances of an officer’s truthfulness being called into question, that might yet be uncovered.
In discussing potential ramifications, Coffindaffer speculated that these issues might form the basis of suppression hearings, where the defense would aim to dismiss specific pieces of evidence. As she explained, “They’re going to try to bring up actions perhaps of that individual in the past that they were involved in something that involved not being truthful about finding something.”
Drawing comparisons to the notorious O.J. Simpson case, the hosts noted how this strategy had been used effectively against Detective Mark Furman, whose credibility was undermined by past actions. Coffindaffer elaborated on the possibility of the defense extrapolating past conduct to argue that either the evidence found or the interviews conducted were tainted.
Brueski raised concerns about this strategy’s difficulty and potential ramifications, asking, “Is that an attainable goal to reach? Or could this end up just making them look utterly ridiculous in trying to go down that road?”
In response, Coffindaffer remained pragmatic: “The defense will throw out everything they possibly can,” she said, pointing out that this is common practice when faced with a strong case. She highlighted the assertion that touch DNA had been misinterpreted as a dirty tactic and explained the biological basis behind this evidence. She asserted that such allegations would continue to surface to discredit the investigation.
This comprehensive analysis offered by Brueski and Coffindaffer provides a peek behind the curtain at the strategic maneuvering that often characterizes high-profile trials. As the Kohberger case progresses, the insights shared by these veteran crime watchers will continue to provide valuable context and understanding.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
