The Bullet That The DA Claims Links Richard Allen To Delphi Murders Is Based On Junk Science

Published by Tony Brueski on

What if the case against Richard Allen isn’t as solid as it seems? In this episode, Tony Brueski dives deep with retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer into the unsettling reality behind forensic bullet analysis. While TV shows make it look foolproof, real-life bullet markings are far from a perfect match and could even be misleading. They discuss how extractor and ejector marks—tiny, often invisible scratches—are being presented as definitive evidence in the trial. But is it enough to say, “this is the guy”? As Allen’s fate hangs in the balance, the town is faced with bigger questions: what happens if he’s innocent, and a killer still walks free? Or, is the case driven more by emotion and pressure than by actual proof?

If the science doesn’t hold, where does justice go from here?
#ForensicScience #BulletAnalysis #RichardAllenTrial #JusticeSystem #TrueCrimeMystery #LegalDrama #HiddenKillersPodcast**
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com