Russell Laffitte Pays The Price For Playing With Alex Murdaugh
In a recent episode of the podcast “Hidden Killers,” retired FBI Special Agent and Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, Robin Dreeke, joined host Tony Brueski to discuss the recent sentencing of Russell Lafitte, the former CEO of Palmetto State Bank. Lafitte received a seven-year federal prison sentence for assisting Alex Murdaugh in defrauding clients of nearly $2 million from legal settlements.
Reflecting on the situation, Dreeke expressed sadness and uncertainty regarding Lafitte’s claim of innocence. Dreeke said, “This one’s really sad to me. And it’s sad because I don’t know what to think about it.” He referred to Lafitte’s behavior as being similar to a “frog in a boiling pot of water,” slowly acclimating to the rising temperature until it’s too late to escape.
Throughout the conversation, Dreeke reflected on his experience working with the FBI and examined the behavior patterns of those who commit heinous crimes. He emphasized that Lafitte’s actions don’t necessarily indicate that he was “born to do this,” but instead, he was likely “wrapped up in some really bad people” and became part of the destructive path that resulted.
In response to Dreeke’s observations, Brueski agreed that Lafitte’s situation was likely more complex than it initially appeared. He speculated that Lafitte may not have been fully aware of the extent of the fraudulent activities, possibly due to confirmation bias. However, he underscored that this doesn’t excuse the former banker’s actions.
In considering the role of Alex Murdaugh, Brueski suggested that his defense of Lafitte might be a result of either grandiosity or genuine remorse. He questioned, “Is he doing that because he’s a pure psychopath looking for grandiosity? Or is he actually trying to be a decent human being, defending someone that he knowingly duped?”
The discussion turned toward Lafitte’s sentencing, with Brueski questioning whether Murdaugh’s defense of Lafitte had helped or hindered his case. Dreeke noted the importance of holding everyone accountable for their actions, stating, “No one is above the law, and if you’re part of any of these horrendous things that’s taken advantage of another human being, we’re gonna get you.”
Despite the complexity and ambiguity of the case, both Brueski and Dreeke agreed that justice had been served. Brueski summed up the sentiment, stating, “I think justice was served.”
The conversation concluded with a sobering observation: Murdaugh’s destructive behavior has far-reaching impacts that are still unfolding. Dreeke noted, “This is a lifetime of behavior that is unraveling before our eyes.”
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Reflecting on the situation, Dreeke expressed sadness and uncertainty regarding Lafitte’s claim of innocence. Dreeke said, “This one’s really sad to me. And it’s sad because I don’t know what to think about it.” He referred to Lafitte’s behavior as being similar to a “frog in a boiling pot of water,” slowly acclimating to the rising temperature until it’s too late to escape.
Throughout the conversation, Dreeke reflected on his experience working with the FBI and examined the behavior patterns of those who commit heinous crimes. He emphasized that Lafitte’s actions don’t necessarily indicate that he was “born to do this,” but instead, he was likely “wrapped up in some really bad people” and became part of the destructive path that resulted.
In response to Dreeke’s observations, Brueski agreed that Lafitte’s situation was likely more complex than it initially appeared. He speculated that Lafitte may not have been fully aware of the extent of the fraudulent activities, possibly due to confirmation bias. However, he underscored that this doesn’t excuse the former banker’s actions.
In considering the role of Alex Murdaugh, Brueski suggested that his defense of Lafitte might be a result of either grandiosity or genuine remorse. He questioned, “Is he doing that because he’s a pure psychopath looking for grandiosity? Or is he actually trying to be a decent human being, defending someone that he knowingly duped?”
The discussion turned toward Lafitte’s sentencing, with Brueski questioning whether Murdaugh’s defense of Lafitte had helped or hindered his case. Dreeke noted the importance of holding everyone accountable for their actions, stating, “No one is above the law, and if you’re part of any of these horrendous things that’s taken advantage of another human being, we’re gonna get you.”
Despite the complexity and ambiguity of the case, both Brueski and Dreeke agreed that justice had been served. Brueski summed up the sentiment, stating, “I think justice was served.”
The conversation concluded with a sobering observation: Murdaugh’s destructive behavior has far-reaching impacts that are still unfolding. Dreeke noted, “This is a lifetime of behavior that is unraveling before our eyes.”
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
