Kohberger’s Empty Alibi Filed, Claiming: ‘I Wasn’t There’… Maybe…

Published by Tony Brueski on

Tony Brueski, host of the “Hidden Killers” podcast, has offered an in-depth exploration of the recent developments in the trial of Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of the shocking murders of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. As the deadline for providing an alibi passed, Brueski unpicked the complex threads of Kohberger’s defense strategy, from vague hints about a potential alibi to insinuations of evidence tampering.
 
 “Do we have an alibi in the case of Brian Kohberger?” Brueski asks in the podcast, “Well, that all depends on how you want to read the tea leaves. Because that’s very much open for debate.” The host indicates the current ambiguity surrounding Kohberger’s alibi. Despite Kohberger’s repeated assurances of his innocence and his promise of eventual exoneration, the defense team chose to submit a generic statement, falling short of a proper alibi, as the alibi submission deadline approached.
 
 The host calls this development into question, stating, “If you have hard factual evidence showing that you were indeed somewhere else being corroborated by other people, you bring that to light before trial because a judge can take a look at that and go, okay, this can be verified, we can drop these charges.” Brueski notes that the decision to withhold such crucial information could stem from either a calculated move by a defense attorney in their effort to vigorously defend their client, or be a showcase of Kohberger’s alleged narcissistic tendencies.
 
 Brueski emphasizes his suspicions regarding Kohberger’s refusal to disclose details of his alibi, remarking, “I’m guessing he’s remaining silent because he sounds like an incompetent fool when talking about what exactly went on that day.” The host opines that Kohberger’s silence is a strategy to prevent himself from sounding foolish if he tries to explain his movements on the day of the crime.
 
 The case takes another bewildering twist as the defense team suggested the possibility of evidence tampering, specifically that Kohberger’s DNA could have been deliberately planted at the crime scene by law enforcement. Brueski delivers a dose of sarcasm in response, “Yes, they’re going the OJ route with all else. Let’s get a glove involved, too, shall we?”
 
 The podcast host further scrutinizes this claim, arguing, “The court filing suggesting the potential evidence that shows the presence of Kohberger at a different location during the murders and the questioning of the validity of the DNA evidence both occurred ahead of the alibi submission deadline. Developments suggest the Kohberger ‘s defense team may be employing a strategy of simply sowing seeds of doubts.”
 
 Brueski closes the podcast with a striking prediction, “But the belief of this podcaster right here is that man is going to soak in and enjoy every moment of the ride until he meets the bullets.” He suggests that Kohberger may be taking pleasure in the unfolding drama, oblivious to the inevitable consequences he is facing.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com