How Strong Is The DNA Link In The Kohberger Case?
In a riveting episode of the podcast “Hidden Killers,” host Tony Brueski delves deep into the controversial use of genetic genealogy DNA as evidence with guest Eric Faddis, a former felony prosecutor, and attorney. The conversation centered on the perplexing case of Brian Kohberger, a man at the heart of a quadruple murder investigation that leaves as many questions as answers.
Brueski initiated the discussion by pointing out the polarized perspectives on genealogical DNA, with some considering it “gold,” while others view it as shaky at best. Addressing the matter, Faddis remarked, “So the genealogical alleged link between Kohberger’s father and some biological material on the knife sheath… it’s certainly something, but it’s not as strong as having the defendant Brian Kohberger’s DNA on there.” The implication is clear: defense attorneys will likely scrutinize the validity of this DNA link, questioning its reliability and potentially the competence of the analysts involved.
Beyond the DNA, another intriguing detail emerged in Kohberger’s defense: an admission of his habitual nighttime driving. While not a crime, Brueski found this detail potentially problematic, suggesting it might paint Kohberger in a suspicious light to jurors. Faddis concurred, noting, “There’s something a bit ominous about it. Is it a crime? No… but is it something that colors the impression that the jury might get of Brian Kohberger in a negative way? You bet.” To make matters more complex, a vehicle resembling Kohberger’s was reportedly seen near the crime scene on the night of the murders.
The nighttime driving revelation seems inextricably tied to another piece of the puzzle: cell phone triangulation evidence. With Kohberger’s admitted predilection for driving late, the defense may be setting the stage to challenge the accuracy of cell phone triangulation. Faddis weighed in on this strategy, asserting, “Like you said, the defense already knew that there’s a cell phone triangulation that places Kohberger near the scene at certain times… is this alibi just a way to explain away all of that cell phone stuff?”
However, for Kohberger to convincingly present this alibi to the jury, he might have to testify personally, a move Faddis considers could be fraught with danger, especially given the high-stakes nature of a quadruple murder trial. He remarked, “That would subject him to some rather perilous cross-examination.”
Amidst the discussion of alibis and DNA, one glaring gap remains in the case against Kohberger: motive. The podcast host and guest pondered over potential motives, including theories rooted in jealousy or social exclusion. However, as Faddis emphasized, while motive isn’t strictly necessary for prosecution, it’s often what jurors desire to hear. “They’ve got to provide the jury with some reason why the accused would commit such a heinous, egregious act.”
Recent reports suggest potential social media interactions between Kohberger and the victims or their associates. Yet, these remain vague. Faddis underlined the importance of establishing a clear connection between Kohberger and the victims, warning of the dangers of leaving jurors with unanswered questions.
As the Kohberger trial looms, it promises to be a courtroom drama filled with forensic challenges, defense strategies, and the ever-present quest for a motive. And as always, the “Hidden Killers” podcast remains at the forefront of such discussions, shedding light on the intricate nuances of the criminal justice system.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
Brueski initiated the discussion by pointing out the polarized perspectives on genealogical DNA, with some considering it “gold,” while others view it as shaky at best. Addressing the matter, Faddis remarked, “So the genealogical alleged link between Kohberger’s father and some biological material on the knife sheath… it’s certainly something, but it’s not as strong as having the defendant Brian Kohberger’s DNA on there.” The implication is clear: defense attorneys will likely scrutinize the validity of this DNA link, questioning its reliability and potentially the competence of the analysts involved.
Beyond the DNA, another intriguing detail emerged in Kohberger’s defense: an admission of his habitual nighttime driving. While not a crime, Brueski found this detail potentially problematic, suggesting it might paint Kohberger in a suspicious light to jurors. Faddis concurred, noting, “There’s something a bit ominous about it. Is it a crime? No… but is it something that colors the impression that the jury might get of Brian Kohberger in a negative way? You bet.” To make matters more complex, a vehicle resembling Kohberger’s was reportedly seen near the crime scene on the night of the murders.
The nighttime driving revelation seems inextricably tied to another piece of the puzzle: cell phone triangulation evidence. With Kohberger’s admitted predilection for driving late, the defense may be setting the stage to challenge the accuracy of cell phone triangulation. Faddis weighed in on this strategy, asserting, “Like you said, the defense already knew that there’s a cell phone triangulation that places Kohberger near the scene at certain times… is this alibi just a way to explain away all of that cell phone stuff?”
However, for Kohberger to convincingly present this alibi to the jury, he might have to testify personally, a move Faddis considers could be fraught with danger, especially given the high-stakes nature of a quadruple murder trial. He remarked, “That would subject him to some rather perilous cross-examination.”
Amidst the discussion of alibis and DNA, one glaring gap remains in the case against Kohberger: motive. The podcast host and guest pondered over potential motives, including theories rooted in jealousy or social exclusion. However, as Faddis emphasized, while motive isn’t strictly necessary for prosecution, it’s often what jurors desire to hear. “They’ve got to provide the jury with some reason why the accused would commit such a heinous, egregious act.”
Recent reports suggest potential social media interactions between Kohberger and the victims or their associates. Yet, these remain vague. Faddis underlined the importance of establishing a clear connection between Kohberger and the victims, warning of the dangers of leaving jurors with unanswered questions.
As the Kohberger trial looms, it promises to be a courtroom drama filled with forensic challenges, defense strategies, and the ever-present quest for a motive. And as always, the “Hidden Killers” podcast remains at the forefront of such discussions, shedding light on the intricate nuances of the criminal justice system.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
